|
How to tell if your Net girlfriend is scamming you. One of the livinginthephilippines3
members said;
Yes, calling her cell (mobile phone) is a good one,
occasionally she will really have a "LOW BAT" but not too
often.
It's also very easy for you (just like it is for her) to get a
separate email address and send her chats and emails and
you'll find out right away if she's faithful. Most of the
scammer girls have so many men chatting that they won't know
where u came from, just think u came off a chat room, in
fact if they ask, just say you saw them in a chat room. It
seems kind of underhanded to be doing this but like someone
said, It's a new world we live in cyber world.
Another thing to look for is how their English in chats and
texts matches up with their English when you speak in person
or on the phone. Lots of girls have their English fluent
friends (amigas) helping them chat.
My little pear turns out to be a real slut, lots of sex chat,
she has over twenty men she is communicating with and
several who will be in her city in the next month or few.
She'll be having sex immediately with them, and good luck to
them all in the disease department. Glad I found her out
before I arrive. I have no desire to be in line with a
bunch of other guys.
She's now also working in a short time hotel as a massage girl
(prostitute) and I shudder to think of the little petri dish
now. She tells all the men the same thing. Getting divorced,
how I mistreated her, I love you so much honey, my future
husband, can't wait to see you, on and on. She has the copy
and paste technique down pat and sends the same loving
emails to all the guys
Kind of pathetic for the guys. I'd really recommend just going
to the Philippines and meeting girls during the course of
your day, (not night) Girls who are in school or working in
department stores etc.
The Philippines is full of many nice girls to meet and it's
really an unwise move to waste your time on chatting with
girls on the net. Too much chance for head and heartache.
Anyway, this site is about LIVING IN THE PHILIPPINES so if
you are going to live in the PI, just go there and hang out
and you'll meet plenty of nice girls.
If you're looking for a wife to bring back to your country,
good luck, but that is not really the forte of this site is
it? Lots of luck guys, enjoy life!
|
Another LINP3 member
wrote a couple of things for you to watch out and look for.
. .
I have listed a couple of things for you to watch out for and
look for.
1. I would shy away
from girl that are very internet proficient, or least
watch them "very closely." Why are they so proficient at
using the internet? A job or what? |
2. I strongly
suggest use of a cam, sometimes you can actually
see them typing and your not getting messages. Some
girls are really fast typers and can chat with several
guys at one time. With a cam, it also helps to verify
that they are "actually girls." Many
men impersonate
women on the internet.
|
| 3. Getting messages
that don't seem to pertain to your conversation.
Sometimes they get their "wires crossed" and forget to
switch windows. |
| 4. If your girl has
a cell phone she should pretty much be reachable at
anytime. So call at different times like Friday &
Saturday nights, in the middle of the day etc. |
| 5. Asking for money.
A nice Filipina usually has a very hard time doing this. |
| 6. Check out their
profiles to see how long they have had it. New profiles
could translate into a new scam, though thesis not
etched in stone. |
| 7. Ask a lot of
questions, and archive all chats, e-mails for review at
a later date. Plus if your relationship last, you will
need these to help support a "proof of relationship" if
you decided to marry her. |
| 8. Get to know the
family, and neighbors. Though sometimes they will lie
too, but more so the family. They like $$$ too. |
| 9. Multiple screen
names if she has several it's a "red flag." She
might ask you to switch to her "other screen name." |
| 10. If and when you
decide to send her money, if she seems "to familiar with
knowing the ropes" that could be a red flag. This would
indicate she has received money before ... why? |
| 11. Before you go
off to see her .. get a COPY of her Birth Cert. No
exceptions .... One of the biggest scams going on right
now is under age girls setting up guys and extorting
money from them so they don't have to go to jail. The
parents are "in" on this. |
| 12. Her telling you
that she loves you right off the bat. |
| 13. Wanting to come
to America or your country to be with you. Though this
is not a guarantee she is a scammer, but a girl in love
with "you" would be happy having you move to her country
too, if her motive is to be with "you." |
| 14. Do they work?
Where does their chat money come from? |
| 15. Talking sex ...
Most good Filipina's are very reserved, and have higher
moral values than here in the USA. |
| 16. Refusing to talk
openly about past relationships if any. |
| 17. Does she go to
church regularly? And does she live what she says she
believes? |
| 18. Check her out ..
have a friend try and get next to her, and she if she
responds positively to his advances. |
| 19. Does she think
about you and your needs or more about her and her
needs? Is she "win-win"? |
| 20. Does she
"pressure" you in any way? |
| 21. Does she treat
others with respect? her parents, friends, ex's,
authority figures ? Look for signs of inconsistency, and
expect to be treated the way she treats "others" after
your relationship "settles in." |
| 22. How does she
seem to handle money? |
23. Does she appear
to be "focused" on money, status, materialism, or image?
If so these values are superficial, beware ! Finally,
does she appear to have a noble character, be truth-
worthy, is she helpful, have humility, a servants heart,
is she industrious, does she plan ahead for possible
problems, she is "needy," does she build people "up" or
tear them down, does she have a happy, well-adjusted
personality, and again ... is she praised and respected
by family and friends?
Hope this helps .... but remember the only guarantee is
... there are "no guarantee's.
Internet Girl friends, Boys and
Girls, Gays, Men and Women,Homosexuals
A member who's wife worked as a manager in an Internet
Cafe gives the low down from his wife's unique
perspective on Internet Relationships in answer to
another poster on our mailing list you can join at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/
LivingInThePhilippines3
You are right, George. There are Internet scams
everywhere. You can't say that they are "worse" anywhere
since the Internet recognizes no borders. It's not a
question of "some Filipina's" scamming foreigners. All
you need to do is spend a some time in any of the
hundreds of Internet cafes surrounding the schools and
colleges in the RP to see that the greater number of participants are far more interested in computer games
than anything else. You will also see quite a number of
Filipinos chatting with foreigners. My wife managed
several Internet cafes while going to school and
afterwards and she has stories that might amaze you!
There are many boys and girls, transvestites and gays,
engaged in the foreigner game. Many are in it for the
money, some of them just for fun. There are cliques who
challenge each other with more outrageous tricks; trying
to get a foreigner to expose himself on his webcam for
instance. The more successful of them play their
foreigners, knowing just what words to use to extract a
few dollars without ever having to ask directly.
According to my wife, it is harder to find legitimate
girls who use the cafes to "chat" with their foreigner
b/f's because they are often ridiculed by the others.
She and I used e-mail because she drew less attention
than if she were to be using chat or a webcam, but then
we knew each other very well before we even started
Internet communication.
Bottom line...DON'T SEND MONEY to someone half way
around the world who you've never seen! You may be
supporting a gay or a guy with a family who look quite
amazing on a webcam, or you might be an unwitting party
to games being played by a group of barkadas for fun.
Take the trip. See that person eye-ball to eye-ball; get
to know her, her friends and family in person! Then, and
only then, make up your mind whether you want to send
money. At least then you'll have some idea where your
money is going.
Another thing, these "scams" go both ways! She tells me
that a number of foreigners use the chat rooms to line
up their "entertainment" while planning vacations to the
RP. They tend to play the provincial girls, some
distance from the cafe's clustered around the colleges,
where young people aren't quite so savvy.
I know that as sure as I'm sitting here, that these
words will be ignored by those who know that "their
girl" is the exception
*By way of disclaimer, Living in the
Philippines should mention that it doesn't have an
affiliate relationship with any of these entities.*
Two Hundred Thousand Pinoys Offering Cyber Sex From the
Cybersex Department.
“More than 200,000 Filipinos — women, men and possibly
children — are offering sex via the Internet,
Catanduanes Rep. Joseph Santiago revealed yesterday.
[If this is a true number, and it could be, my bet is
the vast majority of these Filipinas, and Filipino's
many gay, only signed up, but don't check their
accounts. Filipinos spend money on rice not Internet. It
has one of the lowest Internet usage ratios in the
world. And the ubiquitous cell phone takes what
discretionary funds most have. The cell phone inhibits
Internet growth among the masses, I am convinced.]
He said one website claims to have a list of 212,257
potential online sexual partners from the Philippines…
He said based on what that site says, ‘the Philippines
now has the world’s 15th largest list of possible sexual
partners on the Internet.
We find this surprising considering that outside the
office, very few Filipinos have ready access to personal
computers with an Internet connection,’ he said. ‘This
only suggests that a number of Internet shops may be
fronting for cyber sex operations and there are many
gangs here running clandestine cyber sex dens,’ he
added. ‘We are gravely worried that going forward, as
the country’s Internet users increase, illicit cyber sex
activities will also proliferate. Cyber sex operators
corrupt and prostitute our women and children. They
should be dealt with severely,’ he said.” —Philippine
Headline News Online (Philippines).
That being said, however, you get the sense that this is
the one of those pseudo-issues that politicians love to
drum up now and then. Probably he was cruising for
casual sex himself and happened to note that there were
so many “pinoys” or Filipinos on AdultFriendFinder. Why
not raise a hue and a cry, he must have thought, about
the way the internet is corrupting the local morals?
It’s always a safe way to polish an image or garner a
few votes. After all, who would publicly admit that they
want to see the local morals corrupted?
Once you consider the matter, it shouldn’t be all that
surprising that the Philippines has the world’s
fifteenth largest list of cybersex partners. In the
first place, it’s the twelfth most populous country in
the world, so there are plenty of people to offer
themselves online. In the second place, sex is already
big business in the Philippines. It has long been known
as one of the “established sex tourist destinations.” In
the third place, internet usage is exploding in the
Philippines, just as it is in other parts of the world.
According to a report written a few years ago, “the
Internet has become more accessible through schools,
offices, libraries and Internet cafes…
A proliferation of Internet prepaid cards means access
costs are lower compared to monthly subscriptions… ‘The
internet market is growing slowly but surely in the
Philippines, and given our population potential, the
Philippine internet user may become a very important
part of the internet economy…’” And that “internet
economy” doubtless involves lots of sex.
[I feel the marriages made though the mail order
bride sites, about 6,000 a year will not bring in as
much money as the cyber sex business. But the cyber sex
businesses will bring in money mostly to the foreigner's
who finance the illicit and I guess illegal cafes where
women and men can disrobe. The existing laws are not
effective in keeping these poor people from being
exploited. Like pimps, the operators don't even have to
pay minimum wage!" Don October 4, 2005]
MORE ADVICES >>> |
|
|
|
The daily
use of a variety of
communication technologies, such
as email, instant messaging, and
the mobile phone, is now a fact
of life for an increasing number
of people, both at work and in
their personal life. At work
these technologies are relied
upon for a wide range of tasks,
such as collaborating with
colleagues, reporting to
superiors and communicating with
customers. At home they are used
to stay in touch with family and
friends, and for involvement in
local communities.
As communication technologies
become more ubiquitous in our
daily interactions, an important
question is raised: how does the
design of these technologies
affect the phenomenon of lying?
Lying is an important, and
frequent, part of everyday
social interactions.
Research from social psychology
suggests as many as one third of
typical daily interactions
involve some form of deception.
This can be defined as a
“deliberate attempt, without
forewarning, to create in
another a belief which the
communicator considers to be
untrue.” DePaulo and her
colleagues, for example, have
observed that university
students report telling about
two lies a day, while
non-student populations report
about one a day.
The types of lies observed in
these studies vary, from small
“white” lies, in which
inconsequential lies are told to
be tactful or polite (such as
saying “I love your haircut”
when in fact you do not), to
more serious lies (such as
denying an affair).
How does the increased use of
communication technologies
affect these kinds of deceptions
in our day-to-day social
interactions? The design of
various technologies creates
very different communicative
environments that may have
important implications for lying
behaviour. The telephone, for
example, allows people in
different physical locations to
communicate with vocal and
prosodic cues intact, while
text-based media such as email
and instant messaging, eliminate
or distort nonverbal channels.
We asked whether speakers were
more or less likely to lie on
the phone, in an email, or
during an instant messaging
exchange than they are
face-to-face. Are different
types of lies more likely to be
told in one medium than in
others?
We have examined deception in
the three most commonly used
daily communication media, the
telephone, email and instant
messaging, in an effort to
determine how the design of
these technologies affects lying
behaviour.
Participants were students drawn
from upper-level Communications
courses at a north-eastern
American university, and they
all participated for course
credit. There were 28 subjects:
13 males, 17 females, with an
average age of 21. They reported
lying about 1.6 times a day on
average, and about one out of
every four of their interactions
involved a lie, replicating
DePaulo’s original estimates,
which indicated that students
lied 1.9 times a day on average,
and that a third of their social
interactions involved some
deception.
The primary objective of our
study, however, was to determine
the effect of the design of
different communication media on
lying behaviour during everyday
social interactions. Although
the total number of lies was
greatest in the face-to-face
setting, the highest proportion
of lies occurred in telephone
conversations, with 37 per cent
of phone interactions involving
some deception, significantly
higher than lies in face-to-face
conversations (27 per cent).
Two prominent theories suggest
that a single underlying
dimension influences the
probability of deception. Media
Richness Theory predicts
speakers will choose the richest
media, (specifically face to
face) to lie most frequently.
However, we found this was not
the case; telephone interactions
involved significantly more lies
than face-to-face interactions,
suggesting that a media’s
richness is not the primary
factor operating in lying
behaviour across media.
The Social Distance Hypothesis
argues that speakers will choose
less-rich media when engaging in
deception in order to avoid the
discomfort associated with
lying. Contrary to the Social
Distance Hypothesis, in our
study significantly fewer lies
were reported in the least rich
media, email, and no difference
was observed between instant
messaging and face-to-face. It
seems the social distance of
communication technology, and
the relief from the discomfort
of being deceptive that it may
provide, does not predict
everyday lying behavior.
Both theories are overly
simplistic. Communication media
can be differentiated along a
number of design features that
are not captured by either
richness or social distance.
Our model predicts that
according to the degree in which
a medium 1) allows for
synchronous interaction, 2) is
record less, and 3) is
distributed (that is, the
parties are not in the same
place), the greater the
frequency of lying that should
occur in that medium.
Our study shows that telephone
interactions, which are
distributed, synchronous and
record less, had the greatest
rate of deception. Face-to-face
interactions, which are
synchronous and record less but
not distributed, involved the
next highest rate of deception,
while email, which is
distributed but not synchronous
or record less, had the lowest
rate of deception. Instant
messaging, which did not differ
in the rate of lying from
face-to-face interactions, is
distributed and nearly
synchronous, but is recorded in
a log file.
Our study suggests that the
design of communication
technology, such as email,
instant messaging and the
telephone, has an impact on
everyday lying behavior. It is
important to note that these
technologies are not obscure, or
limited to only highly
sophisticated users, but instead
are used by millions of people
across the globe on a daily
basis. As such, these data have
important implications for those
of us who use these technologies
to accomplish our everyday
communicative activities at work
and at home. In particular, the
results indicate that we are
more likely to lie (and to be
lied to) on the telephone than
in any other medium, and to lie
the least in email.
What guidance does this research
offer for developers and
managers? Our findings suggest
that specific design features
can be used to influence rates
of everyday forms of deception.
For example, if the objective in
a given situation is to reduce
overall deception during social
interactions, then a
communication medium should be
used that is asynchronous and
recordable. Also, technologies
that specify the user’s current
physical activity, such as
videoconferencing, should reduce
deception by reinstating the
constraints of co-presence. If,
for whatever reason, the goal is
to facilitate deception, then
our model suggests these factors
should be reversed.
According to recent studies,
mutual trust develops most
slowly in text-based
interactions. Our experiment
suggests that, somewhat
ironically, participants lied
least frequently in text-based
interactions, especially email.
How this irony will resolve
itself over time is an
interesting question. Will
people begin to lie more
frequently as they become more
comfortable with text-based
media? Or, as communication via
text becomes increasingly
ubiquitous, will people come to
trust others more readily in
their text-based interactions?
Research that examines how the
design of everyday communication
technologies affects these types
of interpersonal processes will
become increasingly important as
these technologies continue to
support more and more of our
social interactions.
[Jeff
Hancock] |
|