|
CHAPTER 1
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
1. THE CONCEPT OF
LABOR. In its broadest sense, labor includes every
possible human exertion, mental or physical, and even spiritual. In
a more limited sense, it refers to any bodily or intellectual
exertion done wholly or partly for a purpose other than the pleasure
derived from its performance (51 C.J.S. 470-7 1).
In Philippine law, labor is sometimes used to embrace all work
without pretence to whether it is done by an employee for an
employer or not. In this sense, the work of agricultural tenants has
been included within the general term. This is because they
physically toil for their livelihood, and work to some extent for
their landowners. Thus, the old labor law, Comm. Act. 103, which
provided for labor organizations, lumped together laborers,
employees and tenants. This same law referred also to agricultural
workers and tenants, and even impliedly recognized their rights to
strike.
In general, as used in Philippine law, the concept of labor includes
in its broad sense physical and mental work performed by an
employee, and physical work performed by anyone, whether employed by
another or not. The present Labor Code, PD 442, carries in its
Preliminary ‘flUe a Chapter (II) on Emancipation of Tenants, and
identifies tenant- farmers as “a vital part of the labor force”
(Art. 8, LC). This is an application of the general concept of this
term.
2. LABOR LAW DEFINED. The
evolution of Philippine labor law has substantially changed the
original definition of the term, particularly as to the elements
that comprise the law. In light of this development, a new
definition of labor law may be framed as follows:
“Labor law is that body of statutes, rules and doctrines that
defines State policies on labor and employment, and governs the
rights and duties of workers and employers respecting terms and
conditions of employment by prescribing certain standards therefore,
or by establishing a legal framework within which better terms and
conditions of work could be obtained though collective bargaining or
other concerted activity.”
This analytical definition reflects the updated concept of labor law
within the purview of the Philippine Constitution and the Labor
Code. Since it also embodies the definitions of the elements of
labor law -- as explained below --it also assumes a utilitarian
character.
3. ELEMENTS OF LABOR LAW. Based
on the definitions given, the elements comprising labor law are
apparent, namely: a) labor policies; b) labor standards law; and c)
labor relations law. These are explained seriatim, in this way.
a) Labor Policies. These are
principles or guidelines that define State policies regarding labor
and employment. Although these policies do not govern the relations
per se between workers and employers, they represent a new dimension
that is an integral part of labor law. Labor policies may be
classified into Constitutional policies (e.g. Au XIII, Sec. 3,
Constitution), and statutory policies (e.g. Books I and II, Labor
Code).
b) Labor Standards Law. From the
definition of labor law, as given, one may cull a definition of
labor standards law, to wit; “It is that body of statutes, rules and
doctrines that governs the rights and duties of workers and
employers respecting terms and conditions of employment by
prescribing certain standards therefore,” These standards, whether
maximum or minimum, serve as bases of the rights and duties of
workers and employers. Examples of labor standards laws are Book
III- Conditions of Employment, Labor Code, as well as the decrees on
Cost of Living Allowance (PD 525) and on 13th Month Pay (PD 851).
c) Labor Relations Law. Our
given definition of labor law also contains a working definition of
labor relations law. This can be collated from these words, “It is
that body of statutes, rules, principles and doctrines that governs
the rights and duties of workers and employers by establishing a
legal framework within which better terms and conditions of work
could be obtained through collective bargaining or other concerted
activity. “This element of labor law sets the legal parameters
whereby workers may undertake concerted activities to secure better
conditions of employment than those prescribed by labor standards
law. The prime example of this element of labor law is found in Book
V-Labor Relations, Labor Code, and its amendatory laws.
4. RELATIONSHIPS AND DISTINCTIONS.
These elements of labor law are interrelated in that each is
complementary to the others. All together, they present the legal
limits within which labor and employment acts may be justified.Labor
Policies set the guidelines to be implemented by the other two.
Labor Standards laws prescribe the demarcations in terms and
conditions of employment, and are essentially substantive. Their
purpose is either protective (e.g. law on hours of work, law on
weekly rest periods) or ameliorative (e.g. minimum wage laws, law on
holiday pay).
Labor Relations laws provide the procedures that govern the methods
by which terms and conditions of work over and above the &marcations
as set by labor standards laws may be obtained, hence they are
largely procedural in character (e.g. law on labor organizations,
law on collective bargaining).
Labor standards, being fixed by law, may be found in the law itself
whereas terms and conditions of work beyond these standards obtained
under labor relations laws are not found in the law itself, but in
collective bargaining agreements, arbitration awards and decisions.
5. SOCIAL LAW. Social law may be
defined as “that body of rules and statutes aimed at promoting the
general welfare of all the people, with special reference to labor.”
The labor orientation of social laws has a two-fold justification.
Firstly because labor constitutes the great majority (about 85
percent) of the population, hence any effort to achieve the
well-being of all the people, or at least the greatest good for the
greatest number should be directed toward this sector. This is the
quantitative reason. Secondly, since the aim is to promote the
welfare of society, any attempt to strengthen society should be
addressed toward its weakest link, which is labor This is the
qualitative reason.
Hence, while social laws --like the SSS law, GSIS law, Medicare
Act---have workers as their direct beneficiaries, their ultimate end
is the well-being of society in general.
6. LABOR LAW AND SOCIAL LAW COMPARED.
Both labor law and social law share the same objective, which is the
promotion of social justice. Social law is the broader concept, for
while labor law seeks to improve the well-being of the lower classes
of society, i.e. labor, social law tries to ensure the welfare and
economic security of all the people, or if this is not possible, to
bring about “the greatest good to the greatest number.” 1 In this
context, it may be said that labor law is a part of social law, and
it is by nature a social law.
There are, however, differences between the two, namely:
a) As to object--Labor law seeks
to improve the well-being of labor in particular, social law aims to
promote the welfare of society in general.
b) As to subject matter--Labor
law deals on subjects of proximate and direct interest to workers
(e.g. wages, hours of work, etc.); social law treats of matters of
remote or indirect interest to workers (e.g. employee compensation,
social security etc.)
c) As to application--Labor law
provides benefits to workers actively employed; social law is
concerned the those whose employment is interrupted by sickness,
disability, death, retirement, or other causes.
7. SOURCES OF THE POWER TO ENACT LABOR
LAWS.
The State’s power to enact labor laws springs from two basic
sources; the Constitution and Police Power
The Constitution lays down as a State policy that “The State arms
labor as a primary social economic force. It shall protect the
rights of workers and promote their welfare.” (Art. II, Sec. 18).
In its Protection to Labor clause (Art. XIII. Sec. 3), the
Constitution also provides, inter alia “The State shal1 afford full
protection to labor, local and overseas, organized or unorganized,
and promote full employment and equality of employment opportunities
for all. .
“The State shall regulate the relations between woricers and
employers
.“ From these passages atone, it is evident that the Constitution
grants to the State the power to enact laws that will carry out
these policies.
The other source is the inherent power of the State known as Police
Power. This may be defined as “The power of the State to enact laws
and prescribe regulations that will promote the health, morals,
education, good order, safety, and general welfare of the people.”
(Primicias vs. Fugoso, 80 Phil. 71).
Recent jurisprudence has formulated a newer definition of Police
Power as “The inherent power of the State to enact legislation that
may interfere with personal liberty and property in order to promote
the general welfare.” (PASEI vs. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386).
Even if there were no provisions in the Constitution concerning
labor, the State would still have the power to enact labor laws by
virtue of its Police Power which underlies the Constitution, and is
as enduring as the State itself.
8. THE RATIONALE OF LABOR LAWS. Although the rights and
duties arising from labor relationships are basically contractual in
nature, these are not governed by the general law on obligations and
contracts (Book IV, Civil Code). The reason for this is enunciated
by the Civil Code itself, thusly:
“The relations between capital and labor are not merely contractual.
They are so impressed with public interest that labor contracts must
yield to the common good. Therefore, such contracts are subject to
the special laws on labor unions, collective braining, strikes and
lockouts, closed shop, wages, working conditions, hours of labor and
similar subjects.” (Art. 1700, Civil Code)
The special laws referred to are known collectively as labor laws.
Next Pages
|