Just Having Fun > Chika-Chika, Chit-Chat, Philippine Related

2020/21 Philippine Family Incomes?

<< < (2/3) > >>


Since posting as I did above I realize, upon more mature consideration of the vexing issue on income inequality, that I may have misapprehended the thrust of your post.  It may be, perhaps, to your observation, that Tito-boy is the poster boy for the lower echelons of income distribution in the Phils and that most of its denizens are just like him - with greater attachment to the demon rum (or Red Horse) and good times with the boys than to any attachment to the workforce.  So, in short, most of those on the lower rungs are there by choice.  I am not sure that I would agree with that, but, as I have said, I really do not have much empirical evidence to back up a considered opinion.  Just sitting here on a Sunday morning, overlooking a calm sea, having coffee, engaged in divers musings.

As an aside, do you think it was wise to have written off Tito-boy summarily?  I mean, sa lunes ng umaga, maybe his carabao broke down, or he developed a galloping case of Covid-19, 20 or 21, or some such calamity intervened.  Yes, the next day, it became clear that he screwed up.  But now, having bought Red Horse and pulutan for his barkada on credit at the local sari sari, he has been shamed (as well as being out of pocket).  From what I have seen, Filipinos generally don't take well to a loss of face.  That could lead to trouble in some parts of the Phils where I have lived. 


--- Quote from: Hestecrefter on February 01, 2021, 02:45:08 AM ---that I may have misapprehended the thrust of your post.
--- End quote ---

HC ....  I believe you have missed the Forrest.

--- Quote from: Hestecrefter on February 01, 2021, 01:52:54 AM ---Very sporting of you.
--- End quote ---

The amount offered is immaterial.  He exercised his free will as an individual human by accepting it.

--- Quote from: Hestecrefter on February 01, 2021, 02:45:08 AM ---But now, ......... , he has been shamed
--- End quote ---

Who is the architect of the shame?  The fruits of his celebratory hubris are his wages.

 Strategic thought matters.


What is "income inequality"? 

This thread lists figures that described how it is, who has it, where it is.   But do not define what it is.  Think about it like an engineer.

Obviously there are lower, middle, and upper bounds being described.

In order to measure something you have to have agreement.  There is a universal agreement that a centimeter is such and such length.  Using that convention we can now estimate distance the world over.

Who set the metrics of "equality"?  Where did they set them?  Subsistence level?  Did they ask for our input on this variable?

If my memory serves, you are in pretty good circumstances.   What if your lifestyle exceeds the adjudicated level? 

What if the social contract decides, for you, that your ability in this life will be held on par with Tito?

Is that not slavery?

 Frank Dikötter and Robert Conquest  have written extensively on the consequences of abdicating the responsibility of coping with "income inequality".   

Perhaps you will find them to be more informative than random Google searches.


--- Quote from: lost_in_samoa on February 01, 2021, 05:14:20 AM ---HC ....  I believe you have missed the Forrest.
If my memory serves, you are in pretty good circumstances.   What if your lifestyle exceeds the adjudicated level? 


 Frank Dikötter and Robert Conquest  have written extensively on the consequences of abdicating the responsibility of coping with "income inequality".   

Perhaps you will find them to be more informative than random Google searches.

--- End quote ---

I'll accept I missed the forest, or the trees, or both.

Yes, I consider myself to be in "pretty good circumstances".  Right now, among the legions of YouTube "vloggers" who claim to be experts in living in the Phils, moving there, retiring there, etc., is one who, like many, says one can live well in most parts of the Phils on USD1,500 per month.  He suggests that even if one's income exceeds that, one should "live small" and pay no more than about $200 a month for rent and so on.  He speaks of what he sees as the particularly well-heeled as having maybe $5,000 a month to spend. But, even then, he suggests "living small", to have extra money for "other things".  Such as what?  Stuff it into a bank account?  Or buy more things?  He and most vloggers speak against that.  The sage advice seems to be to own no more than you can pack into a suitcase and be free to walk away on a moment's notice.  Not my style.

So I probably won't move back to the Phils.  If I lived up to my income, I would find myself a tad embarrassed.  I would be considered by the locals as mayabang.  As I said above, I feel somewhat guilty for having so much more than even most of the wealthier Filipinos, when I see myself as no more worthy or deserving than they are.  So I feel more comfortable where I am, around those who are similarly circumstanced.  I am not particularly attracted to moving there and pretending to be poor.  If I wanted to do that, I'd move back to LA, give away what I have, and move into a homeless camp near Venice Beach.  More agreeable climate there.

I think I'll pass on your recommended reading.  Not really appealing to me.  I was prepared to spend 5 minutes on google today, but that about exhausts my appetite for the topic.  I defer to your much greater knowledge and ability to address the topic.  I erred in posting here on a topic on which I am ill-equipped to present cogent and compelling expertise, knowledge, insight or anything else, apart from what I called some random musings.  So I shall bow out, duly chastened.


--- Quote from: Hestecrefter on February 01, 2021, 06:23:28 AM ---So I shall bow out, duly chastened.
--- End quote ---

Sorry I did not mean to put you off.

Just watchin the world around me and growing 'maters.

Regarding Income Inequality in the Philippines, and being the original poster, allow one to thank everyone whom chose to write on this matter. It has resulted in some honest, interesting posts. 

Regarding the thread, maybe Wikipedia may provide a somewhat fair and reasonable summary?

Quoting:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_Philippines

"According to World Bank Director Motoo Konishi, the Philippines had become a "rising tiger" economy in East Asia, especially during the 2010–2011 fiscal years. Also the recent gross domestic product (GDP) figures for the Philippines show that the economy has been growing steadily at a rate of 6.8% over this decade.

However the benefits of this economic growth have not yet trickled down to the poorer segments of the population, as seen with the malnutrition and poverty that continues to plague the country, and this despite the fact that the economy still seems to be growing.

According to research, the poorest 20% of the population have a 4.45% share of the national income, while the top 20% has a 76.5% share of the income. Research showing that the poorest 20% of people earn 14,022 pesos, while the richest 20% of people earn 176,863 pesos, also suggests that the distribution of wealth is uneven in the Philippines.

Compared to other Countries

Out of 149 countries, the Philippines ranked approximately 60th in terms of wealth inequality; with list-neighbor countries such as Indonesia and Micronesia. Ukraine and Iceland topped the list as the worlds most equal countries, whereas South Africa was on the opposite side of the list.

Corruption in the Philippines

A main cause of income inequality in the Philippines is its political culture. It is a spoils system which is based on relationships between leaders of political parties to other politicians and local elites. Thus, this patron-client system has created a system where a small number of powerful and wealthy families are in control of the political system.

Due to this, powerful politicians are able to fill appointive government positions with their allies and also preventing more deserving individuals from serving. There have been many examples in past history of the corruption that is taking place.

Income Tax Inequality

Income tax also becomes a factor to income inequality, because according to the Tax Management Association of the Philippines, Filipino workers pay the highest income tax in the entire Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) region.

An average Filipino worker is taxed 32% as long as he is earning more than the minimum wage. The minimum wage earners are the only ones who are tax-exempt. Corporations are taxed less than individual earners at a tax rate of 30%.

Education Inequality

Based on the 2013 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey, which had a sample size of 36 million Filipinos aged from 6 to 24, fully 19.2 percent of respondents cited "insufficient family income" as their top reason for not attending school."

End Wikipedia Quote.


[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version