Turn the question around: Is it OK to answer violence with violence?
Fair enough.
To answer to your query perhaps you should poll the survivors of,
Australia 1900-1969, Guatemala 1966-1996, Pakistan (Bangladesh War of 1971), Burundi 1972 and 1993, North Korea, Equatorial Guinea, East Timor under Indonesian occupation, Laos, Sabra-Shatila, Lebanon, Ethiopia, Iraqi Kurds, Tibet, Brazil, Democratic Republic of Congo, West New Guinea/West Papua, Somalia, Azerbaijan, Sri Lanka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Rwanda, Cambodia, Darfur, Sudan
Uhmmmm ..... that's just a partial list of the last 60 years of the government sponsored violence.
"The tyranny of some is possible only through the cowardice of others. "
-- Jose Rizal -(Letter to the Young Women of Malolos)
Bit of an "open-door" question. Like asking: would you like to pay more tax? No. Would you like a better healthcare and infrastucture? Yes. You get the desired outcome by the way the questions are formulated.
You are being disingenuous. You equate the quality of health-care and infrastructure with taxes.
The two are not interdependent.
In my opinion, the best health care and infrastructure is always free market derived and self procured.
As you have demonstrated, Some questions are leading.
I thought my request was very straight forward.
Do you believe that people have the right to defend themselves? Yes or
No.